首页 / 院系成果 / 成果详情页

Prospective head-to-head comparison of routine non-invasive scores for predicting severe cirrhosis-related morbidity in the general population  期刊论文  

  • 编号:
    18E203D45EF2C19C47286AE76D69380F
  • 作者:
    Liang, Zhuoshuai#[1]Jin, Huizhen[1];Gao, Wenhui[1];Hu, Xinmeng[1];Xi, Yingao[1];Zhang, Hongrui[1];Cheng, Yi[2];Shi, Jikang*[3]Liu, Yawen*[1,4]
  • 语种:
    英文
  • 期刊:
    HEPATOLOGY ISSN:0270-9139 2026 年 ; 2026 MAR 23
  • 收录:
  • 关键词:
  • 摘要:

    Background and Aims:Effective non-invasive risk-stratification tools are essential for the early detection of individuals at high risk for cirrhosis, to enable timely intervention. We conducted a prospective, head-to-head comparison of fibrosis-based and outcome-driven routine blood-based risk scores for predicting cirrhosis-related morbidity in a large community-based cohort.Approach and Results:We first performed a systematic review to identify risk scores derived from routine liver blood tests, and then evaluated them in the UK Biobank. Severe cirrhosis-related morbidity was defined using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Discrimination and clinical utility were assessed using the Wolbers C-index, time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and cumulative incidence accounting for competing risks. The review identified 12 eligible risk scores (10 novel models plus APRI and FIB-4). Among 385,738 participants, the 10-year cumulative incidence of severe cirrhosis-related morbidity was 0.39% (1498 events). Most novel scores outperformed APRI and FIB-4. LiverRisk showed the highest discrimination at 5 years (C-index 0.847) and 10 years (C-index 0.812), closely followed by CORE (5-year C-index 0.839; 10-year C-index 0.811). In contrast, CORE achieved better enrichment of high-risk individuals, with an AUPRC of 0.088 compared with 0.063 for LiverRisk. At low referral proportions, increasing the CORE threshold yielded greater net benefit than a sequential CORE-LiverRisk referral strategy.Conclusions:CORE and LiverRisk are the most discriminative routine blood-based tools for predicting long-term cirrhosis-related morbidity in the community. When referrals are limited, a higher-threshold CORE-only strategy may outperform a sequential CORE-LiverRisk approach.

  • 推荐引用方式
    GB/T 7714:
    Liang Zhuoshuai,Jin Huizhen,Gao Wenhui, et al. Prospective head-to-head comparison of routine non-invasive scores for predicting severe cirrhosis-related morbidity in the general population [J].HEPATOLOGY,2026.
  • APA:
    Liang Zhuoshuai,Jin Huizhen,Gao Wenhui,Hu Xinmeng,&Liu Yawen.(2026).Prospective head-to-head comparison of routine non-invasive scores for predicting severe cirrhosis-related morbidity in the general population .HEPATOLOGY.
  • MLA:
    Liang Zhuoshuai, et al. "Prospective head-to-head comparison of routine non-invasive scores for predicting severe cirrhosis-related morbidity in the general population" .HEPATOLOGY(2026).
  • 入库时间:
    4/22/2026 10:20:47 PM
  • 更新时间:
    4/23/2026 12:20:17 AM
浏览次数:10 下载次数:0
浏览次数:10
下载次数:0
打印次数:0
浏览器支持: Google Chrome   火狐   360浏览器极速模式(8.0+极速模式) 
返回顶部